IPOH: Teoh Beng Hock’s fiancee has entered the blogosphere to express her feelings and views on life and death.
Soh Cher Wei, whose blog “Don’t Say Goodbye” (http://sohcherwei.blogspot.com/), has just published a poem-like post which describes how she has been coping after his death.
Soh wrote that the two of them had been unlucky as those with self-interests had treated them like pawns in a game of chess.
“In the end, you are blamed (and) you are also gone forever,” she said.
She noted that it would be better for Teoh to be living “in the other world” than here.
She said she was only putting up a brave front now so as not to let others worry about her.
“The right to choose is not within my hands from the start. I have no option to say ‘No’, I have no right to object. I could only obey and follow the given path. I have no choice at all,” she wrote in the Mandarin blog.
In the Sept 23 entry, entitled “Am I Happy?”, Soh said with the people around her at ease, she would feel less sorry for herself.
Soh lamented that no one could provide her with an answer.
Despite all these upheavals, Soh gave her word that she would not commit suicide as she did not want to end up in hell, never to be reincarnated.
“We will then be apart as you are in heaven,” she wrote.
Before she ended, Soh said she would be reunited with Teoh after his death was avenged.
“Only death by old age awaits me now,” she said.
A check yesterday found that the blog had garnered 57 comments, mostly words of encouragement.
Read more!
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Monday, September 7, 2009
Teoh family outraged at MACC chief's suicide theory
By Debra Chong
KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 7 – As the inquest into the death of a Selangor government political aide drags on with no clear end in sight, his grieving family’s frustration is fast turning into fury.
This is especially over the latest reported remarks made by the chief commissioner of the national anti-graft body, which many believe to have had a hand in pushing him over the edge.
The family of the late Teoh Beng Hock denounced the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan for publicly insinuating that the 30-year-old political secretary had committed suicide because he “could not withstand the pressure”.
Teoh’s younger sister, Lee Lan noted that Ahmad Said had told Chinese-language daily, Sin Chew Daily, earlier this month that he had been informed of 10 cases of people jumping from buildings after being investigated by Hong Kong’s Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) since its set-up.
The MACC, formed in January this year, was modelled after the ICAC.
“He also said that if people investigated could not withstand the pressure and jumped from the building, there was nothing that they (MACC) could do,” Lee Lan told The Malaysian Insider, repeating her statement to reporters last Saturday after saying prayers for her brother at the Seck Kia Eenh Temple in Malacca.
“If the MACC continues to make irresponsible remarks which cannot be substantiated with proof, we are prepared to go and see the Prime Minister again to urge him to immediately set up a comprehensive Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate into Beng Hock’s cause of death,” she added, speaking for the rest of her family.
The family scored a meeting with Datuk Seri Najib Razak in his Putrajaya office on July 28.
“No stone will be left unturned in finding out the real cause of death and, if there is any foul play, action will definitely be taken,” the PM promised them then.
Lee Lan, who was the closest of three other siblings to Teoh, challenged Ahmad Said to answer three questions:
1. Who saw Beng Hock jump from [the] MACC building?
2. Beng Hock was classified as a witness in the investigation, what pressure would he have faced?
3. Will MACC’s interrogation method bring about pressure on the witness or suspect to cause them to jump to death?
Teoh was found dead outside the MACC’s Selangor office in Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam on July 16, the same day he was to register his marriage to his pregnant sweetheart.
He had been interrogated overnight by MACC investigators probing claims that his boss, first-term Selangor DAP state lawmaker and executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah, had unlawfully dipped his fingers into state funds.
The inquest will resume tomorrow after a one week break.
Lee Lan, who was the closest of three other siblings to Teoh, challenged Ahmad Said to answer three questions:
1. Who saw Beng Hock jump from [the] MACC building?
2. Beng Hock was classified as a witness in the investigation, what pressure would he have faced?
3. Will MACC’s interrogation method bring about pressure on the witness or suspect to cause them to jump to death?
Teoh was found dead outside the MACC’s Selangor office in Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam on July 16, the same day he was to register his marriage to his pregnant sweetheart.
He had been interrogated overnight by MACC investigators probing claims that his boss, first-term Selangor DAP state lawmaker and executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah, had unlawfully dipped his fingers into state funds.
The inquest will resume tomorrow after a one week break.
Read more!
KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 7 – As the inquest into the death of a Selangor government political aide drags on with no clear end in sight, his grieving family’s frustration is fast turning into fury.
This is especially over the latest reported remarks made by the chief commissioner of the national anti-graft body, which many believe to have had a hand in pushing him over the edge.
The family of the late Teoh Beng Hock denounced the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan for publicly insinuating that the 30-year-old political secretary had committed suicide because he “could not withstand the pressure”.
Teoh’s younger sister, Lee Lan noted that Ahmad Said had told Chinese-language daily, Sin Chew Daily, earlier this month that he had been informed of 10 cases of people jumping from buildings after being investigated by Hong Kong’s Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) since its set-up.
The MACC, formed in January this year, was modelled after the ICAC.
“He also said that if people investigated could not withstand the pressure and jumped from the building, there was nothing that they (MACC) could do,” Lee Lan told The Malaysian Insider, repeating her statement to reporters last Saturday after saying prayers for her brother at the Seck Kia Eenh Temple in Malacca.
“If the MACC continues to make irresponsible remarks which cannot be substantiated with proof, we are prepared to go and see the Prime Minister again to urge him to immediately set up a comprehensive Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate into Beng Hock’s cause of death,” she added, speaking for the rest of her family.
The family scored a meeting with Datuk Seri Najib Razak in his Putrajaya office on July 28.
“No stone will be left unturned in finding out the real cause of death and, if there is any foul play, action will definitely be taken,” the PM promised them then.
Lee Lan, who was the closest of three other siblings to Teoh, challenged Ahmad Said to answer three questions:
1. Who saw Beng Hock jump from [the] MACC building?
2. Beng Hock was classified as a witness in the investigation, what pressure would he have faced?
3. Will MACC’s interrogation method bring about pressure on the witness or suspect to cause them to jump to death?
Teoh was found dead outside the MACC’s Selangor office in Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam on July 16, the same day he was to register his marriage to his pregnant sweetheart.
He had been interrogated overnight by MACC investigators probing claims that his boss, first-term Selangor DAP state lawmaker and executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah, had unlawfully dipped his fingers into state funds.
The inquest will resume tomorrow after a one week break.
Lee Lan, who was the closest of three other siblings to Teoh, challenged Ahmad Said to answer three questions:
1. Who saw Beng Hock jump from [the] MACC building?
2. Beng Hock was classified as a witness in the investigation, what pressure would he have faced?
3. Will MACC’s interrogation method bring about pressure on the witness or suspect to cause them to jump to death?
Teoh was found dead outside the MACC’s Selangor office in Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam on July 16, the same day he was to register his marriage to his pregnant sweetheart.
He had been interrogated overnight by MACC investigators probing claims that his boss, first-term Selangor DAP state lawmaker and executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah, had unlawfully dipped his fingers into state funds.
The inquest will resume tomorrow after a one week break.
Read more!
Sunday, September 6, 2009
释明圆法师协助‧明福“回家”了
（马六甲）在马六甲青云亭释明圆法师的协助下，逝世近2个月的赵明福终於“回家”了！
释明圆法师週日（9月6日）下午在释迦院明福牌位置放处诵经后，前往他亚罗牙也老家进行设立牌位仪式，先后耗时3小时，让明福回家“团聚”！
张秀花告诉记者，家里设了明福牌位后，她有“明福回家”的感觉，心里比较安乐。
丽君则表示，现在赵家最大的心愿，是真相能早日水落石出，不要一再拖延，大家不希望明福死得不明不白。
明福指示要“回家”
根据赵家远亲郭金福表示，家属是获得“指点”，获悉明福想“回家”的意愿。
仪式后，释明圆法师表示，他是协助將明福的“魂”
请回家，並设立牌位，直到他逝世满100天完成圆坟仪式（10月10日）后，下午才“除灵”（去除灵位）。
“到时，明福將与歷代祖先牌位‘合炉’，往后一起祭拜。”
东禪寺住持释觉诚法师特別赠送赵家一个佛首座，让家人可在家诵经，將功德回向明福。
週日是7月16日逝世的赵明福做“七七”，他的父母赵亮辉和张秀花、大姐赵丽君及妹妹赵丽兰、妻子苏淑慧及父母等亲友皆到释迦院祭拜至亲，向明福做最后一次的告別。
家人为明福准备了很多食物，包括素荤两式佳肴、糕点、发糕、水果、饼乾、冰淇淋和月饼等。
Read more!
释明圆法师週日（9月6日）下午在释迦院明福牌位置放处诵经后，前往他亚罗牙也老家进行设立牌位仪式，先后耗时3小时，让明福回家“团聚”！
张秀花告诉记者，家里设了明福牌位后，她有“明福回家”的感觉，心里比较安乐。
丽君则表示，现在赵家最大的心愿，是真相能早日水落石出，不要一再拖延，大家不希望明福死得不明不白。
明福指示要“回家”
根据赵家远亲郭金福表示，家属是获得“指点”，获悉明福想“回家”的意愿。
仪式后，释明圆法师表示，他是协助將明福的“魂”
请回家，並设立牌位，直到他逝世满100天完成圆坟仪式（10月10日）后，下午才“除灵”（去除灵位）。
“到时，明福將与歷代祖先牌位‘合炉’，往后一起祭拜。”
东禪寺住持释觉诚法师特別赠送赵家一个佛首座，让家人可在家诵经，將功德回向明福。
週日是7月16日逝世的赵明福做“七七”，他的父母赵亮辉和张秀花、大姐赵丽君及妹妹赵丽兰、妻子苏淑慧及父母等亲友皆到释迦院祭拜至亲，向明福做最后一次的告別。
家人为明福准备了很多食物，包括素荤两式佳肴、糕点、发糕、水果、饼乾、冰淇淋和月饼等。
Read more!
不满反贪会言论‧赵家或再见首相
（马六甲）赵明福妹妹赵丽兰表示，若反贪污委员会继续发表没有根据及不负责任的言论，赵家准备再次与首相拿督斯里纳吉见面，要求他即刻成立一个全面的皇家调查委员会，彻查明福的死因。
“我们感到心痛，当我们日夜期望明福的死因能水落石出时，反贪污委员会主席拿督斯里阿末赛益却发表高度不负责任的言论。”
赵丽兰今日（週日，9月6日）上午在马六甲释迦院祭拜哥哥赵明福“七七”后，向记者发表谈话。
阿末赛益於9月1日告诉《星洲日报》，据他所知，香港廉政公署成立至今，已有10人在受调查期间跳楼，他们也无可奈何。
赵丽兰表示，在反贪污局或反贪污委员会歷史中，没有发生过证人或嫌犯跳楼事件；因此，阿末赛益的言论明显是指，明福是因为承受不了压力而跳楼。
3问题挑战阿末赛益
她说，赵家强烈抗议阿末赛益的言论，並挑战他回答3项问题：
（一）是谁看到赵明福跳楼自杀？
（二）明福由始至终都是被反贪污委员会列为证人，他会面对甚么压力？
（三）当局的盘问是否会造成证人或嫌犯崩溃而跳楼？
另一方面，赵丽兰感谢眾多亲友、公眾、法师及佛教组织，自7月16日以来为明福祈祷、诵经及超渡。
Read more!
“我们感到心痛，当我们日夜期望明福的死因能水落石出时，反贪污委员会主席拿督斯里阿末赛益却发表高度不负责任的言论。”
赵丽兰今日（週日，9月6日）上午在马六甲释迦院祭拜哥哥赵明福“七七”后，向记者发表谈话。
阿末赛益於9月1日告诉《星洲日报》，据他所知，香港廉政公署成立至今，已有10人在受调查期间跳楼，他们也无可奈何。
赵丽兰表示，在反贪污局或反贪污委员会歷史中，没有发生过证人或嫌犯跳楼事件；因此，阿末赛益的言论明显是指，明福是因为承受不了压力而跳楼。
3问题挑战阿末赛益
她说，赵家强烈抗议阿末赛益的言论，並挑战他回答3项问题：
（一）是谁看到赵明福跳楼自杀？
（二）明福由始至终都是被反贪污委员会列为证人，他会面对甚么压力？
（三）当局的盘问是否会造成证人或嫌犯崩溃而跳楼？
另一方面，赵丽兰感谢眾多亲友、公眾、法师及佛教组织，自7月16日以来为明福祈祷、诵经及超渡。
Read more!
Friday, September 4, 2009
苏淑慧替爱夫立碑‧明福“已婚”身份入土
（雪兰莪‧士毛月）逝世逾一个半月的赵明福长眠於富贵山庄，今日（週五，9月4日）时家人为他举行立碑仪式。苏淑慧以爱妻身份为明福立碑，让生前还来不及成家的明福带著“已婚”身份入土为安。按照华人传统习俗，家属必须在亲人逝世后的100天內，为已故者完成立碑、超渡及旺山日仪式。
赵明福於7月16日逝世后，无论是举殯日或安葬在墓园后，名牌上都是写著“赵明福相公”，而这是已逝的未婚人士所使用的称呼。
遗相以隱雕方式呈现
不过，他的未婚妻苏淑慧已在8月15日当天入门，媳妇身份获得宗族的確认，是男方家族的一份子，因此週五才得以以妻子之名为明福立碑，並在墓碑上刻名。
由於学校已开课，身为老师的淑慧必须返回峇都巴辖上班，无法出席週五的立碑仪式，整个仪式由哥哥赵铭基、大姐赵丽君及妹妹赵丽兰代劳。
尚未走出丧儿之痛的赵母张秀花则默默地站或坐在墓园旁，时而望著爱儿的坟墓，时而低头不语，只有在孩子们张罗祭品时才稍微有了动作。
赵家为明福带来鲜果和糕点，也为他烧了一些纸扎品如电视机、轿车、冷气机、衣物、金银等等，整个仪式从早上9时开始至10时30分才结束。
协助赵家完成立碑仪式的富贵集团风水部总经理林致劭披露，他们將为明福进行为期3天的超渡，从週五开始至週日，其家属会在最后一天参与超渡仪式。
此外，家属也必须在10月10日的“旺山日”再回到墓园来，为明福“圆坟”，算是为明福往后的“住所”举行“入伙庆典”。
他补充，明福的遗相有別於一般的照片，反而是仿照一代歌姬白光的遗相一样，以隱雕的方式呈现，凸显明福的面貌。
Read more!
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
42名反贪会小组成员应召开紧急会议，讨论阿末赛益是否适合继续当反贪会主席，否则他们应促政府革除他的职位！
马来西亚反贪污委员会主席拿督斯里阿末赛益对赵明福于於7月16日活生生的进入反贪会总部14楼，隔天却被发现卧屍在5楼的不明不白事件，表现得冷酷无情。
阿末赛益告诉星洲日报说，据他所知，香港廉政公署成立至今，已有10人在受调查期间跳楼；如果被调查的人承受不了压力跳楼，他们也无可奈何。
阿末赛益的言论显然是把赵明福的死因，归咎於承受不了反贪会调查的压力而自杀，企图以香港廉政公署成立至今，已有10人在受调查期间跳楼自圆其说。
阿末赛益应証明，香港廉政公署成立至今，已有10人在受调查期间跳楼，如果他只是随口说说，却拿不出証据，是一种极不负责任的做法。
此外，在这10宗香港自杀案中，有几人是嫌犯及几人是証人，因为反贪会不断的宣称，赵明福是以証人，而非嫌犯身份被录取口供。
如果阿未赛益拿不出証据証明上述10人自杀，他就应对自己的不负责任言论道歉。
为了推搪赵明福死因的责任，阿末赛益完全漠视了人民对反贪会的盖世太保式查案手法之关注，並表现出对赶明福的死及其家人的悲痛，亳无悔意或同情心。
阿末赛益也应解释，为何反贪会如此不负责任地对赵明福的死因，作出两种推论，一种是他自杀，另一种是他被反贪会以外的人谋杀。
42名反贪会各小组的成员应召开紧急会议，讨论阿末赛益是否适合继续当反贪会主席，否则他们应促政府革除他的职位！
此外，这42名小组成员不应对反贪会不断蔑视向贪污宣战法定目标，却向民联宣战，充当巫统/国阵要推翻民联雪州政府的爪牙做法视若无睹。
林吉祥
民主行动党国会领袖兼怡保东区国会议员
2009年9月2日
Read more!
阿末赛益告诉星洲日报说，据他所知，香港廉政公署成立至今，已有10人在受调查期间跳楼；如果被调查的人承受不了压力跳楼，他们也无可奈何。
阿末赛益的言论显然是把赵明福的死因，归咎於承受不了反贪会调查的压力而自杀，企图以香港廉政公署成立至今，已有10人在受调查期间跳楼自圆其说。
阿末赛益应証明，香港廉政公署成立至今，已有10人在受调查期间跳楼，如果他只是随口说说，却拿不出証据，是一种极不负责任的做法。
此外，在这10宗香港自杀案中，有几人是嫌犯及几人是証人，因为反贪会不断的宣称，赵明福是以証人，而非嫌犯身份被录取口供。
如果阿未赛益拿不出証据証明上述10人自杀，他就应对自己的不负责任言论道歉。
为了推搪赵明福死因的责任，阿末赛益完全漠视了人民对反贪会的盖世太保式查案手法之关注，並表现出对赶明福的死及其家人的悲痛，亳无悔意或同情心。
阿末赛益也应解释，为何反贪会如此不负责任地对赵明福的死因，作出两种推论，一种是他自杀，另一种是他被反贪会以外的人谋杀。
42名反贪会各小组的成员应召开紧急会议，讨论阿末赛益是否适合继续当反贪会主席，否则他们应促政府革除他的职位！
此外，这42名小组成员不应对反贪会不断蔑视向贪污宣战法定目标，却向民联宣战，充当巫统/国阵要推翻民联雪州政府的爪牙做法视若无睹。
林吉祥
民主行动党国会领袖兼怡保东区国会议员
2009年9月2日
Read more!
Sunday, August 30, 2009
明福託梦称惨死‧赵家吁知情者助討公道
（马六甲）赵明福於7月16日在雪州反贪污委员会总部离奇坠楼毙命一个多月来，家人一直都在等待他能託梦给任何一人，以“道出”死因，没想到前几天他终於“出现”在家人的梦中。明福的妹妹赵丽兰声称，哥哥託梦告诉家人，他是惨死的，並非自杀。
“我们知道，只要有证据，真相才会真正大白，明福才能討回公道。”
“我们再次恳求任何知情者，能够勇敢的站出来，將真相告知我们的律师哥宾星。”
她也说，家人梦见明福时，明福的样子就如平时一样，至於地点则在亚罗牙也的老家。
“相信明福会回来”
“我相信当真相大白时，明福一定会回来，交代他还未交代的事。”
赵丽兰今日（週日，8月30日）在释迦院，与沙登区国会议员张念群、莲花苑州议员李映霞、沙登行动党党员及明福生前的同事祭拜明福后，在明福的灵位前向记者这样指出。
明福的双亲赵亮辉、张秀花、哥哥明基、大姐丽君及外甥皆给明福上香。
淑慧克制情绪不流泪
明福的骤逝，至今仍教家人痛心欲绝，他的母亲、大姐及妹妹在现场多次落泪，尤其丽兰在向记者提及哥哥被反贪会官员污蔑一事时，更是哽咽落泪，令旁人感到难过。
明福的妻子苏淑慧也在场，但她由始至终都沉著应对，当明福的同事在灵位前唱《友谊永在》及《正义最终会伸张》时，明福的姐妹已哭成泪人，反倒是淑慧这时选择別过头去，凝神望向远方，並且不停的用手中的纸张在脸旁挥搧，似乎在努力克制情绪，不让眼泪溃堤。
“污蔑明福抽佣”
赵家促反贪官道歉
赵明福的妹妹赵丽兰指出，反贪会由始至终都指明福只不过是协助调查案件的证人，现在反贪会官员莫哈末安努亚依斯迈竟然把他说成是涉及抽佣的人，为何要这样污蔑、誹谤明福？
“污蔑一名已不能自辩的人，是恶毒，绝不能令人接受的！”
她说，家人对莫哈末安努亚於8月26日在验尸庭上供证时，指责明福涉及112令吉的抽佣行为，感到极度痛心及不满。
“欧阳捍华行政议员告诉我们，明福是绝对清白的，他说那112令吉其实是明福先前垫出去的一项活动开销，並且拥有文件及证据证明明福是清白的。”
赵丽兰披露，虽然验尸官裁决刪除上述供词，但一些网站媒体已报导莫哈末安努亚的这项指责，这已对明福的清白构成伤害。
“莫哈末安努亚必需拿出证据，否则他应公开道歉。”
谁会为112元典当人格？
沙登区国会议员张念群指出，验尸庭开审以来，不但未还明福一个清白，如今却有人在庭上对明福进行人格谋杀，指明福抽佣112令吉，这是不可原谅的行为。
她认为，发表这番话的反贪委员会官员莫哈末安努亚应该收回言论及道歉。
“明福作为欧扬捍华行政议员的助理，若要抽佣，何止112令吉？谁会为112令吉典当自己的人格？”
她说，之前反贪会只说请明福协助调查，现在却在庭上指他抽佣，等於未审先判，这对明福家人带来严重的伤害。
“验尸庭已开审多日，仍无法解答许多疑问。我们对验尸庭不满，也对皇委会缺乏信心。”
许多疑问未解
另外，张念群也提到，明福出事时，反贪委员会说在凌晨3时许就放了明福，手机也交回了，但为何明福的手机却在2天后，由反贪委员会交给警方？这一点，验尸庭一直没有交代。
她称，目前报章对明福事件的报导篇幅越来越少，但却出现越来越多罗生门，她与代表雪州政府的李映霞这一趟来，主要的是表达大家对家属的关心及支持。
“最重要的是，真相大白。在所有有良知的国民中，明福绝对是清白的人，是一名爱国青年，为了国家赔上的性命。”
雪议员先垫钱办活动
莲花苑州议员李映霞说，在民联接管雪州后，已经改善之前国阵未办活动先拨款的方式，民联掌政后，所有申请拨款者必需在活动结束后，连同活动照片及文件呈上，才能进行拨款程序，而通常是两三个月才会批准。因此先垫钱是常有的事。
她说，反贪会领取纳税人的钱，却没有公平调查，反倒对付民联，若反贪会真的要查拨款，就应去查巴生自由区事件。
“我们严厉谴责反贪委员会偏向人格谋杀，一些人为了爭权，不择手段，已不符民主精神。”
她指出，反贪委员会在明福案件上，骚扰了许多证人，並强迫这些证人指明福去世前，精神已出现问题，让大家觉得很不安。
Read more!
“我们知道，只要有证据，真相才会真正大白，明福才能討回公道。”
“我们再次恳求任何知情者，能够勇敢的站出来，將真相告知我们的律师哥宾星。”
她也说，家人梦见明福时，明福的样子就如平时一样，至於地点则在亚罗牙也的老家。
“相信明福会回来”
“我相信当真相大白时，明福一定会回来，交代他还未交代的事。”
赵丽兰今日（週日，8月30日）在释迦院，与沙登区国会议员张念群、莲花苑州议员李映霞、沙登行动党党员及明福生前的同事祭拜明福后，在明福的灵位前向记者这样指出。
明福的双亲赵亮辉、张秀花、哥哥明基、大姐丽君及外甥皆给明福上香。
淑慧克制情绪不流泪
明福的骤逝，至今仍教家人痛心欲绝，他的母亲、大姐及妹妹在现场多次落泪，尤其丽兰在向记者提及哥哥被反贪会官员污蔑一事时，更是哽咽落泪，令旁人感到难过。
明福的妻子苏淑慧也在场，但她由始至终都沉著应对，当明福的同事在灵位前唱《友谊永在》及《正义最终会伸张》时，明福的姐妹已哭成泪人，反倒是淑慧这时选择別过头去，凝神望向远方，並且不停的用手中的纸张在脸旁挥搧，似乎在努力克制情绪，不让眼泪溃堤。
“污蔑明福抽佣”
赵家促反贪官道歉
赵明福的妹妹赵丽兰指出，反贪会由始至终都指明福只不过是协助调查案件的证人，现在反贪会官员莫哈末安努亚依斯迈竟然把他说成是涉及抽佣的人，为何要这样污蔑、誹谤明福？
“污蔑一名已不能自辩的人，是恶毒，绝不能令人接受的！”
她说，家人对莫哈末安努亚於8月26日在验尸庭上供证时，指责明福涉及112令吉的抽佣行为，感到极度痛心及不满。
“欧阳捍华行政议员告诉我们，明福是绝对清白的，他说那112令吉其实是明福先前垫出去的一项活动开销，並且拥有文件及证据证明明福是清白的。”
赵丽兰披露，虽然验尸官裁决刪除上述供词，但一些网站媒体已报导莫哈末安努亚的这项指责，这已对明福的清白构成伤害。
“莫哈末安努亚必需拿出证据，否则他应公开道歉。”
谁会为112元典当人格？
沙登区国会议员张念群指出，验尸庭开审以来，不但未还明福一个清白，如今却有人在庭上对明福进行人格谋杀，指明福抽佣112令吉，这是不可原谅的行为。
她认为，发表这番话的反贪委员会官员莫哈末安努亚应该收回言论及道歉。
“明福作为欧扬捍华行政议员的助理，若要抽佣，何止112令吉？谁会为112令吉典当自己的人格？”
她说，之前反贪会只说请明福协助调查，现在却在庭上指他抽佣，等於未审先判，这对明福家人带来严重的伤害。
“验尸庭已开审多日，仍无法解答许多疑问。我们对验尸庭不满，也对皇委会缺乏信心。”
许多疑问未解
另外，张念群也提到，明福出事时，反贪委员会说在凌晨3时许就放了明福，手机也交回了，但为何明福的手机却在2天后，由反贪委员会交给警方？这一点，验尸庭一直没有交代。
她称，目前报章对明福事件的报导篇幅越来越少，但却出现越来越多罗生门，她与代表雪州政府的李映霞这一趟来，主要的是表达大家对家属的关心及支持。
“最重要的是，真相大白。在所有有良知的国民中，明福绝对是清白的人，是一名爱国青年，为了国家赔上的性命。”
雪议员先垫钱办活动
莲花苑州议员李映霞说，在民联接管雪州后，已经改善之前国阵未办活动先拨款的方式，民联掌政后，所有申请拨款者必需在活动结束后，连同活动照片及文件呈上，才能进行拨款程序，而通常是两三个月才会批准。因此先垫钱是常有的事。
她说，反贪会领取纳税人的钱，却没有公平调查，反倒对付民联，若反贪会真的要查拨款，就应去查巴生自由区事件。
“我们严厉谴责反贪委员会偏向人格谋杀，一些人为了爭权，不择手段，已不符民主精神。”
她指出，反贪委员会在明福案件上，骚扰了许多证人，並强迫这些证人指明福去世前，精神已出现问题，让大家觉得很不安。
Read more!
Friday, August 28, 2009
Officer: I did not hear people arguing
By WANI MUTHIAH and NURBAITI HAMDAN
SHAH ALAM: A Selangor Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officer testified that he did not hear people arguing at his office toilet on July 16 – the day Teoh Beng Hock’s body was found.
Mohd Najeib Ahmad Walad, the state MACC assistant enforcement officer, told the inquest into Teoh’s death that he was at the office until 2.30am on that day and the atmosphere had been calm.
His testimony clearly contradicted that of his superior officer Mohd Anuar Ismail on Wednesday that Teoh and Kajang Municipal Council councillor Tan Boon Hwa had apparently argued.
Mohd Anuar, who is the investigating officer of the case, had testified that his colleague Bulkini Paharudin told him Teoh had an argument with Tan at the men’s room at 2am that day.
Teoh, who is the political aide to Selangor executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah, was taken to the MACC office on the 14th floor of Plaza Masalam here on July 15 to be questioned over alleged irregular disbursement of state funds. He was found dead on the fifth floor the next day.
Mohd Najeib told coroner Azmil Muntapha Abas that Teoh looked uncomfortable and worried when MACC officers paid Ean Yong’s office an impromptu visit on July 15.
Teoh, he said, also appeared troubled while waiting to be questioned at one of the MACC office’s lounge areas.
Questioned by Gobind Singh Deo, who is holding a watching brief for Teoh’s family, on how he knew that Teoh was worried, he said: “From his body language and facial expression. He was uncomfortable with the MACC officers.”
Gobind: So, if given a chance, he would have left?
Mohd Najeib: I don’t know.
On whether he had asked Teoh why he looked uncomfortable, Mohd Najeib replied he did not care and that it was probably due to his mood that day.
However, he said he would have attended to Teoh if he had complained about something to him.
Asked if force was usually used against those under questioning, he said: “As far as I know, no”.
Gobind: So, are you saying there may be but you don’t know?
Mohd Najeib: Yes.
Replying to counsel holding a watching brief for Ean Yong, Salim Bashir, he agreed that he and his colleagues had not obtained a search warrant before going to the executive councillor’s office.
Salim: Do you agree that it would make them uncomfortable, as they were not prepared to welcome the MACC?
Mohd Najeib: No.
He also said there were no verification documents to prove that several invoices printed by him had come from Teoh’s laptop.
There was no standing order or procedure when checking computers during investigations, he added.
Replying to Gobind earlier, Mohd Najeib admitted he did not remember the password to Teoh’s laptop.
Teoh, he said, had typed in the password himself and had only given him the password to access the CPU seized from his office.
Gobind: So, now if you want to go back to the laptop, you can’t?
Mohd Najeib: I can’t.
Read more!
SHAH ALAM: A Selangor Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officer testified that he did not hear people arguing at his office toilet on July 16 – the day Teoh Beng Hock’s body was found.
Mohd Najeib Ahmad Walad, the state MACC assistant enforcement officer, told the inquest into Teoh’s death that he was at the office until 2.30am on that day and the atmosphere had been calm.
His testimony clearly contradicted that of his superior officer Mohd Anuar Ismail on Wednesday that Teoh and Kajang Municipal Council councillor Tan Boon Hwa had apparently argued.
Mohd Anuar, who is the investigating officer of the case, had testified that his colleague Bulkini Paharudin told him Teoh had an argument with Tan at the men’s room at 2am that day.
Teoh, who is the political aide to Selangor executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah, was taken to the MACC office on the 14th floor of Plaza Masalam here on July 15 to be questioned over alleged irregular disbursement of state funds. He was found dead on the fifth floor the next day.
Mohd Najeib told coroner Azmil Muntapha Abas that Teoh looked uncomfortable and worried when MACC officers paid Ean Yong’s office an impromptu visit on July 15.
Teoh, he said, also appeared troubled while waiting to be questioned at one of the MACC office’s lounge areas.
Questioned by Gobind Singh Deo, who is holding a watching brief for Teoh’s family, on how he knew that Teoh was worried, he said: “From his body language and facial expression. He was uncomfortable with the MACC officers.”
Gobind: So, if given a chance, he would have left?
Mohd Najeib: I don’t know.
On whether he had asked Teoh why he looked uncomfortable, Mohd Najeib replied he did not care and that it was probably due to his mood that day.
However, he said he would have attended to Teoh if he had complained about something to him.
Asked if force was usually used against those under questioning, he said: “As far as I know, no”.
Gobind: So, are you saying there may be but you don’t know?
Mohd Najeib: Yes.
Replying to counsel holding a watching brief for Ean Yong, Salim Bashir, he agreed that he and his colleagues had not obtained a search warrant before going to the executive councillor’s office.
Salim: Do you agree that it would make them uncomfortable, as they were not prepared to welcome the MACC?
Mohd Najeib: No.
He also said there were no verification documents to prove that several invoices printed by him had come from Teoh’s laptop.
There was no standing order or procedure when checking computers during investigations, he added.
Replying to Gobind earlier, Mohd Najeib admitted he did not remember the password to Teoh’s laptop.
Teoh, he said, had typed in the password himself and had only given him the password to access the CPU seized from his office.
Gobind: So, now if you want to go back to the laptop, you can’t?
Mohd Najeib: I can’t.
Read more!
Thursday, August 27, 2009
陈文华：爭执的指控是捏造的谎言
加影市议员陈文华郑重否认他在雪州反贪污委员会总部扣留问话期间，曾经和赵明福发生爭执或肢体衝突。
他今日（週四，8月27日）在行动党总部召开的新闻发佈会上说，此项指责是毫无根据且存有恶意，並对他和他的家人造成严重的伤害。
他说，他是自7月15日晚上约9时被带进雪州反贪会总部问话，一直到隔天中午1时35分才被释放。
他指出，当时他大约在晚上10点开始被盘问，一直到凌晨2点多才暂停。
“我当时要求喝水，盘问我的官员就带我到茶水间，喝完水后，我要求打一通电话回家报平安，手机上的时间是凌晨2点30分。”
他透露，这名官员从晚上10点至凌晨2点30分都一直在他身边，而他也不曾去过厕所，所以他认为这名官员指在凌晨2点，看到他与赵明福在厕所发生爭执，完全是一项捏造的谎言。
Read more!
他今日（週四，8月27日）在行动党总部召开的新闻发佈会上说，此项指责是毫无根据且存有恶意，並对他和他的家人造成严重的伤害。
他说，他是自7月15日晚上约9时被带进雪州反贪会总部问话，一直到隔天中午1时35分才被释放。
他指出，当时他大约在晚上10点开始被盘问，一直到凌晨2点多才暂停。
“我当时要求喝水，盘问我的官员就带我到茶水间，喝完水后，我要求打一通电话回家报平安，手机上的时间是凌晨2点30分。”
他透露，这名官员从晚上10点至凌晨2点30分都一直在他身边，而他也不曾去过厕所，所以他认为这名官员指在凌晨2点，看到他与赵明福在厕所发生爭执，完全是一项捏造的谎言。
Read more!
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Teoh Inquest: Officer asleep during interrogation
By WANI MUTHIAH and NURBAITI HAMDAN
SHAH ALAM: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) investigating officer in charge of the case involving Teoh Beng Hock admitted that he would not know if the political aide was threatened when he was questioned by the officers.
Mohd Anuar Ismail said this was because he had been asleep most of the time when his subordinates interrogated Teoh in the early hours of July 16.
He said this at the inquest into Teoh’s death when he was cross-examined by counsel Gobind Singh Deo, who is holding a watching brief for Teoh’s family.
Gobind: During your snooze, you didn’t know what was going on?
Mohd Anuar: The officers briefed me.
Gobind: When you were sleeping, you didn’t know whether there were threats.
Mohd Anuar: I didn’t know.
Teoh, the political secretary to Selangor executive councilor Ean Yong Hian Wah had been summoned to the MACC office at the 14th floor of Plaza Masalam here on July 15 to be questioned over the alleged irregular disbursement of state allocations. He was found dead on the fifth floor the following day.
Mohd Anuar said he did not lodge a report after discovering that Teoh had died but rushed to Putrajaya to consult with his superiors.
Gobind: Your star witness is dead and you didn’t make a police report but got into your car and rushed to Putrajaya? Why did you not call the police?
Mohd Anuar: The situation was panicky as there was a dead person.
Mohd Anuar, 32, also said he had been instructed to go to Putrajaya for further instructions as well as to lodge a police report on July 17 by the Selangor MACC deputy director Hishamuddin Hashim.
Gobind, who wanted to know why Mohd Anuar had left Teoh’s remains “lying there” without even informing the latter’s family, lawyer or boss, suggested he may have done so as there was “something to hide or remove” from the scene.
“I do not agree,” Mohd Anuar replied.
Earlier in the day, Mohd Anuar testified that he did not probe Teoh on his condition during the questioning session with MACC officer Mohd Nadzri Ibrahim at 2am as there was no need to do so.
However, Mohd Anuar who admitted he had gone back to sleep after inquiring if everything was alright, said he noticed that Teoh appeared to be uncomfortable and withholding something when his statement was being recorded.
Mohd Anuar added that he had asked Teoh if everything was okay but Teoh had kept mum.
Asked why he had not tried to find out why Teoh had kept silent and appeared uncomfortable, Mohd Anuar said it had not occurred to him to so.
Gobind also said Teoh’s lawyer M. Manoharan had waited at the MACC office for an hour on July 15 but no one came out to speak to him.
To this, Mohd Anuar said he was not aware that Manoharan had come to the MACC office that day.
On why the questioning had to be carried out throughout the night, Mohd Anuar replied that there was urgency in conducting Teoh’s case given the wide media coverage it had received.
Gobind asked: “You were directed to bring them in and get a confession?”
Mohd Anuar admitted that he had been instructed to do so by Hishamuddin and MACC head of investigation unit Hairul Ilham Hamzah.
The inquest continues today before coroner Azmil Muntapha Abas.
Read more!
SHAH ALAM: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) investigating officer in charge of the case involving Teoh Beng Hock admitted that he would not know if the political aide was threatened when he was questioned by the officers.
Mohd Anuar Ismail said this was because he had been asleep most of the time when his subordinates interrogated Teoh in the early hours of July 16.
He said this at the inquest into Teoh’s death when he was cross-examined by counsel Gobind Singh Deo, who is holding a watching brief for Teoh’s family.
Gobind: During your snooze, you didn’t know what was going on?
Mohd Anuar: The officers briefed me.
Gobind: When you were sleeping, you didn’t know whether there were threats.
Mohd Anuar: I didn’t know.
Teoh, the political secretary to Selangor executive councilor Ean Yong Hian Wah had been summoned to the MACC office at the 14th floor of Plaza Masalam here on July 15 to be questioned over the alleged irregular disbursement of state allocations. He was found dead on the fifth floor the following day.
Mohd Anuar said he did not lodge a report after discovering that Teoh had died but rushed to Putrajaya to consult with his superiors.
Gobind: Your star witness is dead and you didn’t make a police report but got into your car and rushed to Putrajaya? Why did you not call the police?
Mohd Anuar: The situation was panicky as there was a dead person.
Mohd Anuar, 32, also said he had been instructed to go to Putrajaya for further instructions as well as to lodge a police report on July 17 by the Selangor MACC deputy director Hishamuddin Hashim.
Gobind, who wanted to know why Mohd Anuar had left Teoh’s remains “lying there” without even informing the latter’s family, lawyer or boss, suggested he may have done so as there was “something to hide or remove” from the scene.
“I do not agree,” Mohd Anuar replied.
Earlier in the day, Mohd Anuar testified that he did not probe Teoh on his condition during the questioning session with MACC officer Mohd Nadzri Ibrahim at 2am as there was no need to do so.
However, Mohd Anuar who admitted he had gone back to sleep after inquiring if everything was alright, said he noticed that Teoh appeared to be uncomfortable and withholding something when his statement was being recorded.
Mohd Anuar added that he had asked Teoh if everything was okay but Teoh had kept mum.
Asked why he had not tried to find out why Teoh had kept silent and appeared uncomfortable, Mohd Anuar said it had not occurred to him to so.
Gobind also said Teoh’s lawyer M. Manoharan had waited at the MACC office for an hour on July 15 but no one came out to speak to him.
To this, Mohd Anuar said he was not aware that Manoharan had come to the MACC office that day.
On why the questioning had to be carried out throughout the night, Mohd Anuar replied that there was urgency in conducting Teoh’s case given the wide media coverage it had received.
Gobind asked: “You were directed to bring them in and get a confession?”
Mohd Anuar admitted that he had been instructed to do so by Hishamuddin and MACC head of investigation unit Hairul Ilham Hamzah.
The inquest continues today before coroner Azmil Muntapha Abas.
Read more!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
